Comments on: Why is Digg Censoring an Article on Defeating Censorship? http://travelingforever.com/blogs/2006/06/why-is-digg-censoring-an-article-on-defeating-censorship/ Change the world, one journey at a time. Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:23:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: cacnac4 http://travelingforever.com/blogs/2006/06/why-is-digg-censoring-an-article-on-defeating-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-33296 cacnac4 Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:37:28 +0000 http://travelingforever.com/blogs/?p=14#comment-33296 raccnacari raccnacari

]]> By: davidvogt http://travelingforever.com/blogs/2006/06/why-is-digg-censoring-an-article-on-defeating-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-10439 davidvogt Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:17:10 +0000 http://travelingforever.com/blogs/?p=14#comment-10439 Your article is very informative and helped me further. Thanks, David Your article is very informative and helped me further.

Thanks, David

]]> By: trogdoor (same as my name on Digg) http://travelingforever.com/blogs/2006/06/why-is-digg-censoring-an-article-on-defeating-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-52 trogdoor (same as my name on Digg) Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:18:35 +0000 http://travelingforever.com/blogs/?p=14#comment-52 "trog, The article you pointed to is misleading. That software does not actually defeat censorship. It only has a proxy feature that allows its users to use a proxy to circumvent the most basic versions of censorship. My approach is much more sophisticated. " And what do you think of http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/Anonym.OS. I would say that thier approach is MUCH more sofisticated than yours and easier / more convinient for the user. Remember that if you are really paranoid about security you probably don't want to be running a proprietary operating system that may have backdoors built in or spyware unknowingly installed. Anonym.OS has all the censorship busting advantages of your article and then some ( name one feature your article has that it doesn't ). “trog,

The article you pointed to is misleading. That software does not actually defeat censorship. It only has a proxy feature that allows its users to use a proxy to circumvent the most basic versions of censorship. My approach is much more sophisticated. ”

And what do you think of http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/Anonym.OS. I would say that thier approach is MUCH more sofisticated than yours and easier / more convinient for the user. Remember that if you are really paranoid about security you probably don’t want to be running a proprietary operating system that may have backdoors built in or spyware unknowingly installed. Anonym.OS has all the censorship busting advantages of your article and then some ( name one feature your article has that it doesn’t ).

]]> By: Ignorant Savage http://travelingforever.com/blogs/2006/06/why-is-digg-censoring-an-article-on-defeating-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-48 Ignorant Savage Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:12:40 +0000 http://travelingforever.com/blogs/?p=14#comment-48 Digg has some kick ass links to articles about censorship and how to avoid it: http://www.digg.com/search?search=firewall+china The one about defeating China's firewall got 6oo diggs. Cool articles BTW. Digg has some kick ass links to articles about censorship and how to avoid it:
http://www.digg.com/search?search=firewall+china

The one about defeating China’s firewall got 6oo diggs.

Cool articles BTW.

]]> By: Stankles http://travelingforever.com/blogs/2006/06/why-is-digg-censoring-an-article-on-defeating-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-45 Stankles Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:56:43 +0000 http://travelingforever.com/blogs/?p=14#comment-45 trog, The article you pointed to is misleading. That software does not actually defeat censorship. It only has a proxy feature that allows its users to use a proxy to circumvent the most basic versions of censorship. My approach is much more sophisticated. trog,

The article you pointed to is misleading. That software does not actually defeat censorship. It only has a proxy feature that allows its users to use a proxy to circumvent the most basic versions of censorship. My approach is much more sophisticated.

]]>